An Argument in Support of Illegal Downloading Essay

An Argument in Support of Illegal Downloading - Essay Example The music business professes to be the most unfavorably influenced by the pattern in unlawful downloading with lost benefits adding up to billions of dollars as indicated by the Recording Industry Association of America. Between the long stretches of 2004 and 2009, an expected 30 billion melodies were document shared wrongfully despite the fact that authentic download roads, for example, Itunes and Rhapsody exist for tune downloading at a negligible expense to the purchaser (Adkins, Amy â€Å"How Does Illegally Downloading Music Impact the Music Industry?†). Pioneers of the business guarantee this means around 12.5 billion in misfortunes since Napster, the primary free record sharing site previously propelled in 1999. Their lone plan of action in this circumstance is to attempt to find the people who have unlawfully downloaded the music and afterward suing them for a huge number of dollars in evaluated lost income. Simply pondering the way that the music business is attempting to control illicit downloading makes my head turn. There are insufficient law authorities in the nation to screen the online exercises of the considerable number of Americans, also that such a follow up on their part is an infringement of the protection of that specific person. The individuals who are sufficiently unfortunate to get captured are sued for what? A sum that the RIAA realizes the individual can't stand to pay? What exercise is educated at that point? Does it alarm others into halting the criminal behavior? There are other and progressively successful approaches to get to these individuals. The business additionally asserts that these exercises bring about cutbacks and loss of capital for new music speculations. That is on the grounds that the music business has just constrained money related assets with which they can take into account existing ability while growing new ones. There is accepted to have... There is accepted to have been a 20 percent decrease in collection deals in 2002 according to information accumulated by Peinz and Waelbroeck (qtd. in Shannon). This abatement in deals is being accused on the unlawful downloading of music. The music business would have us accept that illicit downloading contrarily influences them in light of the fact that the music that is downloaded for nothing through document sharing administrations doesn't give them an arrival on speculation. They don't get any sovereignties for their organization that delivered the record, or the craftsman who made the record. Essentially, this kind of burglary ought to be viewed as equivalent to monetary harm in their word reference. I will talk about how uneducated this suspicion by the music business is in a later segment of this article. In the event that one were to exclusively base his assessment of unlawful document sharing on the Judgment day situation made by the film, TV, and recording industry, we wou ld imagine that they are really being harmed by the movement and, as mindful and dependable people. Along these lines, it would be to everybody's greatest advantage to stop with the criminal behavior since the individuals who illicitly download are straightforwardly taking an interest in the financial end of media outlets. Be that as it may, nothing could be further from reality. Different wellsprings of data have demonstrated that media outlets, regardless of whether they let it be known or not additionally straightforwardly advantage, and advantage extraordinarily from the illicit downloading of their materials. Truth be told, if there is whatever unlawful downloading ought to be viewed as blameworthy of.

Breaking A Social Norm free essay sample

For my sociology explore different avenues regarding breaking a social standard I went to a recreation center, yet as opposed to strolling around in a forward movement like individuals regularly do, I chose to perceive what sort of social responses I would get if I somehow happened to walk in reverse. I began strolling in reverse when I escaped the vehicle. There was nobody in the parking garage, however I wasn’t sure in the event that anybody could see me from a separation. It wasnt a pleasant outing, however it additionally wasnt coming down. I was all the while trusting I would experience a considerable lot of individuals. I back hawked my way to the path and saw three young ladies out there, they were remaining around taking in the view. One young lady saw me immediately, and afterward I had every one of the three young ladies taking a gander at me with puzzled looks. As I strolled nearer they all appeared to get enveloped with themselves, and they didn’t take a gander at me or state anything as I strolled by. So I continued strolling and got one final brisk look before I adjusted a corner. I strolled past a Jogger on the path that Just didnt appear to notice or care. I sat down on a seat to rest my legs. Its harder to stroll all over slopes hen you are strolling in reverse. I saw a couple descending the path, so I stood up and began strolling in reverse around 10 feet before them. The female didnt take a gander at me, however the male looked and didnt appear to mind on the off chance that I saw him peering toward the circumstance. He even had a half grin all over when he was attempting to make sense of things. I strolled for a couple of moments like this until I got to a territory before a scaffold crossing, so I pulled off the path to the side to let the couple pass me. Neither welcomed nor even took a gander at me. Additionally on my way back up the path, I experienced two men clasping hands n a seat, both welcomed me as I strolled by and one asked Are you having some good times? , to which I answered Yes, much obliged. . Those were the main individuals I saw during my hour trek around the recreation center. I assessed the responses I got from the various individuals I experienced. Each gathering of individuals that I met set some kind of casual socia l approvals upon me. The females that I saw appeared to be shut off, overlooking me like I wasnt there. The sprinter Just didnt appear to mind or notice what I was doing. The couple saw me, yet it appeared the male and female responded in an unexpected way. Like he past females I had experienced, the young lady appeared to be shut off needing nothing to do with me. Be that as it may, the person appeared to be entertained and thought the circumstance was somewhat hilarious. I think since it was somewhat risky and idiotic what I was doing (strolling down a smooth path in the recreation center in reverse), yet it unquestionably caused me to feel like the oddball. None of these individuals needed to be related with me Just on the grounds that I was strolling in reverse. The two guys (who I expect to be gay) appeared to be progressively agreeable and tolerating with me damaging a standard. Maybe being gay and falling outside the social standard permits them to be increasingly secure while ncountering other standard infringement. At the point when I strolled past individuals at the recreation center it was somewhat clever. Within I was figuring how idiotic this must look, and how it wasnt even down to earth to walk this way. My internal cop was revealing to me that it wasnt normal and marginally perilous. If I somehow managed to slip or fall into any other individual while I was doing it, it would be my issue. I wouldnt state it was awkward not complying with a social standard. In any case, the standard infringement itself was awkward. Strolling in reverse is harder to do at that point strolling advances, and it harms your neck investigating your houlder for the entire walk. The experience was unquestionably an intriguing glance at how it must feel to be a pariah. This investigation assisted with demonstrating that social standards are huge in the public arena. I wasnt sure how individuals would respond, yet it appeared to be apparent that similarity strongly affects individuals. I got the chance to perceive how people groups characters change when somebody is breaking a straightforward regular social standard. Strolling in reverse as opposed to strolling advances separates you from individuals and it makes you the oddball. This was a basic investigation, yet additionally happened to wind up being a great deal of fun.

Red Flags and Warning Signs in the Job Interview Process

Red Flags and Warning Signs in the Job Interview Process Are you excited that you made it to the interview?You have all the reasons to celebrate. It’s not an easy journey these days for your resume.It has had to get through the applicant tracking system, some human hands and beat lots of competition. For all your efforts, you’ve already made considerable progress.But as you may know, you still have a long way to go. And the interview is probably the hardest part of the journey to that dream job.Just as you prepared and learned how to write a great resume, you have to prepare for the interview.Much of the preparation you’ll do is meant for passing the interview. As good as that is, you also need to prepare for other possibilities.As a job seeker, it can be difficult to look beyond your need for a job. With the pending bills and desire for financial stability, you can easily become desperate for a job.Desperation can cost you the job because it’s not an attractive trait to have. But at the same time, it can also land you into problem s.The sad truth is that there are organizations where the people working there are wishing they weren’t. The way they are being treated is not right but since they need the money, they choose to stay.Whether you’re desperate for a job or not, it’s important to remember to look out for yourself. Don’t allow yourself to need a job so much that you get into the wrong work environment. The stress which comes from that costs way too much.INTERVIEW RED FLAGS AND WARNING SIGNSFortunately, with the right information, you can recognize a company in which working might not be as good as it looks.Just as with many situations, there are signs which when you see them, you should get concerned. These are the red flags which warn you of possible danger ahead.To recognize the red flags, you just have to do two things, especially after arming yourself with the information availed here. When you know the kind of things to look out for, it becomes easier to recognize them.Watch and listen care fully â€" you may think that since you’re the one being interviewed, you should only focus on impressing the interviewer. That is not the case. As much as you’re looking for a job, you don’t want to land into the wrong place.From your interaction with the interviewer, try and gather as much information as possible about the company.Although you should be observant from the time you walked into the company’s office, you can know a lot by paying attention to the interviewer.Check the body language. Think about their choice of words. Take note of anything that stands out about them. Use this information to make a wise judgment about the position and company.Ask questions â€" before the interview is over, you’ll be allowed to ask questions. Ensure you have questions and don’t just ask about the pay, benefits and work-from-home options. Anything weird you noticed while watching and listening can be clarified here.Do not settle for answers like “I’ve been working here for the past ten years. It’s a great place to work in.”You want to know what the company is truly like.So ask questions which require some explanations. Read our article about questions you should ask an interviewer.Of course, not being the interviewer limits the kind of questions you can ask and how far you can go.But with some tact, you can get some insight. Combining this with your observations can help you know what working there could be like.Here are some warning signs to look out for. Despite being in need of a job, try not to ignore these signs. Doing so can lead to a stressful employment with negative bosses or toxic work environments. Source: RWA Technology People1. The interviewer is offensiveThe interviewer should be as respectful as the interviewee. Just because they are the decision makers doesn’t give them the right to be rude or insulting. If you experience this kind of behavior, then that is a big red flag.The interviewer is largely the face of the company.This is despite any interaction you’ve had with the receptionist. Your interviewer is the person with whom you interact at length and will answer your questions about the company.If the interviewer is rude, then consider that it might be the norm in the company.If not the company, maybe it’s his own nature.But then if the company allows this kind of nature, what do you think of the other staff? What happens if everyone acts without restraint?Furthermore, how would you work with this person if it turns out that you’ll be working under him?If the interviewer isn’t showing respect to you now, he might not show it later.2. There is emphasis on worki ng hardThere is a good reason why laziness is shunned. It’s not a habit or lifestyle worth celebrating since it brings no benefits. Instead, it comes with a cost.Employers will be most happy to see the results which come from hard work.This is normal and expected. You most likely even have your resume stating that you are hardworking.But when the interviewer mentions three times or more how the company values hard work, your antennas should go up. It’s very likely that the interviewer is trying to let you know the kind of work-life balance the staff have.Research has shown that working too long or too hard isn’t necessarily the way to productivity. However, some companies don’t seem to get it. To them, hard work is the way.Don’t be fooled. An employer talking a lot about hard work even before you’re hired, could indicate an attempt to get you to agree with their terms. It’s a way of making you see the hard work as the norm.The problem is that you don’t know just how hard the “hard work“ is. In the worst of cases, the employees of the company could be overworked and with little pay.If you agree with the hard work policy, you will then be binding yourself to an overworking culture. Getting out of that situation will be challenging.3. You’re given an offer too soonAnother sure red flag is getting an offer too soon. “Too soon” might be subjective, but do you really expect only one interview in these days?And even if you’re having only one interview, how normal is it to quickly conclude that you’re the best fit?Every company seeks to do thorough interviews so as to hire only the best. There’s a deliberate intention to avoid the expense of training a new hire who leaves after two months. This could cause an unending cycle of hiring and re-hiring.If you feel as if you haven’t been taken through a thorough interview but are being offered the job, just ask for 24 hours to respond.If they push you to either take it immediately or leave it, be careful. Consider other aspects of the interview and ask yourself what the interviewer’s conduct could be pointing to.4. The job description is vagueOne of the worst thing that can happen to you is working in a position whose job description is vague.A statement like “working on tasks assigned to you by the supervisor,” without clarity on the kind of tasks those might be, is dangerous. This could lay the ground for being overworked since all kinds of tasks are thrown your way.More than that, you’ll not be able to make any career progress in such a work environment.You’ll have stressful days ahead as you work on numerous unrelated tasks for the sake of moving the company forward.Problems with vague job descriptions are usually an indicator of bigger problems with the management. In some cases, the management may be deliberately using this method to keep people under their control.Wherever job descriptions are vague, you find employees with duplicated roles. Someone m ay work on this task today then someone else works on it tomorrow.Upon asking about it, you might be told that you need to handle another task. That might be true.But what is the real motive? That kind of confusion ensures no growth.If for example you didn’t handle the task well, where is the opportunity to learn and improve?Such environments of confusion are one of the hallmarks of abusive workplaces. Your career will not progress and you might even get sick from frustration.5. The pay isn’t commensurate with the amount of workYou may have worked somewhere before. Or you simply checked Glassdoor for salary comparisons. Either way, you have an idea of what your skills are worth.When you start negotiating with the interviewer and they seem to want to stick to a low pay, be careful.The only option you should consider for a low pay is other benefits like work-from-home options and perks. If none of these are satisfactory and the pay is too low for your skills and experience, consid er walking away. Salary negotiations are another area which shows you where the company stands financially. If it’s going down and you’re just getting in, you better be sure of the recovery plan.If they’re trying to reduce costs by paying people less, then that’s not a good place to work.You will likely be working long hours as the company probably also employs fewer people to keep costs low.Working long hours should be under your discretion.Yes, at times you volunteer or simply accept a request to work over the weekend. But when too much work and little pay is the norm, something is not right.6. The interview process is disorganizedYour first impression of the company might be at the parking lot.Maybe the view of the office block or the receptionist’s desk. But apart from all these, the interviewer is the one to paint a more solid picture.The body language, speech, dressing etc aside, how would you rate your interviewer’s overall preparedness for the interview?If it’s below 7 out of 10, make a mental note of it. You will combine this with other insights gained through the process so as to make a decision on the company.If your interviewer is disorganized, is it a big deal?Well, are you disorganized? If no, and you prepared well for the interview, don’t you think she should have done the same?If the interviewer is constantly searching for something and isn’t focused on the interview, be careful.Maybe it’s just a part of the workplace culture.If being disorganized is the kind of thing which renders you unproductive, then keep away from the job. Your productivity will be affected and with that, promotions and pay rises are likely to remain a dream.7. The company/department has no employee turnoverIt’s funny how lies can be spread and designed to cover an ugly truth.And it doesn’t have to be political propaganda. As long as something is being hidden, there is a lurking danger.You probably know that high employee turnover is a sign of dange r.But what about when there is absolutely no or very low turnover?It can be tempting to think everything is fine but deep inside, it could be a big mess.Consider these two possible scenarios behind no or very low turnover claims by a company.There is no upward growth â€" if a company is experiencing growth, its employees should also be growing. When employees are growing, there are promotions and their initial positions become vacant.In other cases, those employees could be growing and deciding to venture into business or get employed by a bigger company. This brings about vacancies and indicate growth opportunities.But if people are not growing or for other reasons aren’t leaving, question it.Since everyone is stuck in their positions, how will you go up?The management is afraid of firing employees â€" this is a big problem as it indicates that the leadership of the company is incompetent. Being afraid of firing employees who need to be fired may arise from different issues.Maybe the manager is just ceremonial and doesn’t have the powers to do so. Maybe he is working with staff who have close connections with the business owner. Maybe he doesn’t have the confidence to do so etc.Whichever the case, that company most likely has unresolved issues.The issues may be ignored but certainly won’t go away.If you join such a company, you’ll be in constant conflict with other team members.This is especially if you are performance-oriented love bringing positive change.Your efforts will be thwarted and frustrations will be high.8. The company/department has high employee turnoverThe opposite of this situation is just as bad, if not worse. When a company has high employee turnover, that is also a red flag.One of the reasons could be that employees are mistreated and thus often leave. It could also be an issue with low pay, being overworked, negative workplace culture etc.Such workplaces have employees who are full of fear that they won’t talk about anything wr ong. They will embrace the wrong and maybe even approve of it.This is what happens in abusive workplaces. The boss can be so tough that no-one dares ask any question.Such an environment is not a healthy one and you should reconsider wanting to join.9. Interviewer badmouths the former office bearerYou’re familiar with and even expect the question about leaving your last job. You know well enough not to speak negatively about your former or current boss.And the same way you should be positive, so should the interviewer. If she speaks negatively about the person who previously occupied the position you’re interviewing for, take note.You may not know her opinion on the former employee but you can ask. For many candidates, when given the opportunity to ask questions, they focus on pay and working hours.But for you, since you’re also seeking to know about the company, ask your questions wisely. Find out why the former employee left, what the day-to-day job is like, what is expected of you if you get hired and similar questions.It is only when you get your interviewer talking that you can get to know some of the hidden stuff. If there is some amount of bad mouthing in the answers, just know that the same could happen when you leave.The answer you receive could also tell you whether the workplace culture is full of gossip and rumors. These are never good for a healthy work environment.10. You’re promised a pay which isn’t put in writingHere is another big one which you should pay attention to.When you get to discuss the pay, take care to get it all in writing. If you have a long list of benefits which you fear you may forget, write them down for reference.If you come to an agreement, all these, together with the terms of promotion and raises, they should be on the offer letter. If anything you decided is not there, raise the matter immediately.Do not accept the offer unless all is clearly on record.This is to protect you from being sidelined for promotions o r being treated to different terms from those agreed upon.Anytime there are inconsistencies between the agreement you had and what is in the offer, be suspicious of possible insincerity.If you work with an insincere boss, you’ll get shortchanged.This can happen either many times or always but not never. It will affect your motivation and overall productivity and later get cited as the reason you’re not promoted.Avoid insincere bosses at all costs.11. Interviewer isn’t enthusiastic about their jobAnother question you must ask the interviewer is what she enjoys about working in the company. If she doesn’t seem happy at the thought of reflecting on her employment, something is wrong.As much as employers want employees who are self-motivated, the work environment has an impact on people. If the environment is not reflective of the attitude expected of the new hire, it won’t work.Negative atmospheres are very strong. And in many cases, that which is bad can more easily affect t he good than the other way round. So, consider choosing not to be negatively influenced.If the one already working in the company struggles to show how the company is fun, don’t think you won’t struggle too.It could be that employees at the company are not treated well, are not fairly compensated or are overworked.Whatever the issue is, once the insider shows that the place may not be what you think it is, beware.12. Your gut feeling says “No”There is something in you, often referred to as your gut feeling, which knows many things even before your mind knows them. As such, your gut feeling can lead you in the right direction.The challenge is usually in following the advice of your gut feeling.Being a visual and logical being, your mind will look for evidence so as to do something. Your gut feeling on the other hand, will know something even before there is physical evidence of it and advice you accordingly.But when your mind can’t substantiate the claims or warnings from y our gut feeling, you tend to ignore them.Then later, depending on the severity of the outcome, you might live with guilt for some time and regret at not heeding the advice.When that voice from within tells you to stop, just follow it. A whisper of the word “No” means that whether physically you can see it or not, there is a real danger lurking.Just follow your instincts and stay safe.CONCLUSIONIn your search for a job, do not get desperate to the point of taking a bad job.A bad job could be one in which you’re overworked, mistreated, disrespected, abused or just paid way below what you should.These are serious dangers which could also impact your own health.Always be on the look out for warning signs and steer clear of bad working environments.

Public Relation Officers - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 301 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2017/09/18 Category Advertising Essay Type Argumentative essay Did you like this example? Job description Public relations (PR) is about managing reputation. This career field aims to gain understanding and support for clients as well as to influence opinion and behaviour. PR officers use all forms of media and communication to build, maintain and manage the reputation of organisations ranging from public bodies or services to businesses and voluntary organisations. They communicate key messages, often using third party endorsements, to defined target audiences in order to establish and maintain goodwill and understanding between an organisation and its public. PR officers monitor publicity and conduct research to find out the concerns and expectations of an organisations stakeholders. They then report and explain the findings to its management. Typical work activities A public relations (PR) officer often works in-house and can be found in both the private and public sectors: from the utility and media sectors to voluntary and not-for-profit organisations. Som e PR officers may be based in consultancies. The role is very varied and will depend on the organisation and sector. Tasks typically involve: * planning, developing and implementing PR strategies; liaising with colleagues and key spokespeople; * liaising with and answering enquiries from media, individuals and other organisations, often via telephone and email; * researching, writing and distributing press releases to targeted media; * collating and analysing media coverage; * writing and editing in-house magazines, case studies, speeches, articles and annual reports; * preparing and supervising the production of publicity brochures, handouts, direct mail leaflets, promotional videos, photographs, films and multimedia programmes; * devising and coordinating photo opportunities; organising events including press conferences, exhibitions, open days and press tours; * maintaining and updating information on the organisations website; * sourcing and managing speaking and sponsorship opp ortunities; * commissioning market research; * fostering community relations through events such as open days and through involvement in community initiatives; * managing the PR aspect of a potential crisis situation. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Public Relation Officers" essay for you Create order

The Framers And The Constitution - 2216 Words

Firstly, The framers wrote the Constitution with the original intent that the philosophy of interpreting it would be strict. They wanted to clearly state exactly how the government will be set up and how the powers of it will be evenly distributed. If the framers were going to make a document that completes so many great objectives and perfects the flaws of the Articles of Confederation, why would they want the people who read the Constitution to interpret it loosely? Such a philosophy would defeat the purpose of writing a Constitution all together. The framers wanted the people who read and interpret the Constitution to understand that everything said in the document is exact and that there are no implied powers within it. The idea of†¦show more content†¦John Dickinson can be used as a model for how these delegates wanted the Constitution to be viewed mainly because he was a delegate himself and also becasue he wrote the first draft of the Articles of Confederation. Since he wrote the Articles, it is safe to say that he would know the issues with it, especially since he was also on board with the ratification of the Constitution. Dickinson did not like the fact that the British taxing the colonies so much, just as most every American didn’t like it; however, Dickinson decided to write about his view and complaints in a series of essays entitled, Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania. In the letters/essays published over the years of 1767-1768, he talks about British policies and unjust laws that the British were making, as well as urging people to resist said laws. Through these letters, one can determine fairly easily that Dickinson did not approve of a monarchy, or even a very strong centralized government for that matter. Therefore, Dickinson would have never approved of any implied powers given in the Constitution as he believed that a strong centralized government was not good because it would resemble the monarchy of Britain in which he despised. Secondly, Hamilton’s philosophy of constitutional interpretation must be found and derived from the documents that he wrote or was affiliated with. The first of these documents was written entirely by

The Most Common Way of Death Inside a Jail - 536 Words

Timothy Souders was in an inferior place and suicidal when he went to jail at twenty-one for shoplifting. In his cell he brook a stool and tried to flood the cell. He was then locked up in his cell in the 100 degree weather. He denied water and died in four days. Many tragic things happen in jail such as rape, beatings, embarrassing strip searchings and gang violence. Many of these things happen from the guards and lawyers. Lawyers are know for slipping drugs in their shoes, guards have been known for selling drugs and alcohol to the inmates. A prisoner said he noticed a guard from the pub and says the guard brought him a bottle of vodka every friday. Lisa Harris was caught smuggling a phone in to a prisoner who had raped his ex girlfriend and threw acid in her face. From 2007-2008, four hundred and fifty-two jails said their death rate decreased when 324 reported an increase. In 2008 there were 960 inmates that suffered devastating deaths in the U.S. jails. In 2009 there were 948, that is one hundred and twenty-seven deaths out of every hundred thousand inmates. But there are two sides to every story one guard says he has been working in jails for over seven years and only saw one rape. The most common way of death inside jail is suicide; Suicide is also the third leading cause in prison. This is because it is a lot harder to commit suicide in prison. To commit suicide in jail or prison the prisoners do drug overdose and self inflected wounds. But the most common wayShow MoreRelatedPrison And The Prison System Essay1472 Words   |  6 Pagesleave a remarkable toll on the inmates life in many different categories. The first and arguably most important comes in the form of mental health. Living in prison with have a great impact on the psychological part of your life. For example, The prison life is a very much different way of life than what us â€Å"normal† humans are accustomed to living in our society. Once that inmate takes their first step inside their new society, their whole mindset on how to live and communicate changes. The inmate’s psychologicalRead More Models of Corrections Essay1250 Words   |  5 Pages2. What is the crime control model of corrections? 3. What are the differences between prisons and jails? 4. What is your opinion about the constitutional rights of prisoners? 1. What is the community model of corrections? This model of corrections main purpose was to reintroducing the offenders in to the community. This Program was invented to help offenders in the transition from jail to the community, aid in the processes of finding jobs and stay connected to their families and theRead MoreEssay about Jails, Prisons, and Rehabilitation981 Words   |  4 PagesPrisons and jails are both referred to as incarcerations. A prison is where people get physically confined and lack personal freedom, and also those awaiting trails and those serving a term exceeding one year are confined here, while a jail is where inmates are housed prior to their trials on local level and those serving a term of one year or less. The society is protected from the offenders by them being confined in prisons, where their behaviors can be monitored, or they can be placed in community-basedRead MoreDeath Penalty Is Cruel And Unusual Punishment1706 Words   |  7 Pages In 1962 the Supreme Court thought that death penalty as cruel and unusual punishment. Because of this 107 people had their sentences changed to something that was not death. In November 1972 nine months after they had this choice the California electorate amended the state constitution overruled it. Then in 1973 the Supreme Court decided that the death penalty was unconstitutional. The California legislation was passed in 1973, which meant that the death penalty could only happen under certain conditionsRead MorePersuasive Essay On Crime And Punishment929 Words   |  4 Pagesforgive or do we blame. When confronted with a crime especially when the person has lied before it becomes hard to believe them the next time they do something wrong this might lead to make them victims of terrible psychological or physical trauma or death nothing can feel more natural then if you blame someone else for all your mistakes and its not your fault for doing this some people just can help lie to others because they think they might get be discovered and the other person might tell the onRead MoreJeffrey Dahmer : An Strange Boy1646 Words   |  7 Pagesthings such as his sexuality, his sexual desires and his obsessive interest in death. Dahmer stated at his trial that around this age he had created his own cemetery of dead animals. He would walk around with garbage bags and collect dead animals. Then he would experiment with them in ways that he would later do to humans such as drilling holes in their heads and chopping off their body parts. Jeffrey Dahmer was the most notorious serial killer in history because his killing spree lasted for 13 yearsRead MoreFailing Is Very Common And Acceptable, We Are Set To Fail1558 Words   |  7 PagesFailing is very common and acceptable, we are set to fail in order to learn from our mistakes. Think about an adolescent who has been executed because the jury sentenced him, but it turns out he was innocent. Would human failure be acceptable in this specific case? Of course, not, â€Å"lear ning† from this mistake would not bring the person’s life back it would only reinforce us to accept how inhumane the death penalty is. In the 18th century, society endorsed that killing people due to their crimes wasRead MoreCorrections in teh Criminal Justice System1076 Words   |  4 PagesWhen most people hear the term, â€Å"corrections† they probably think of prisons, striped uniforms, cellblocks, armed guards, and surly prisoners. Part of American corrections is prisons, but corrections is much more than that. Corrections includes prisons, jails, halfway houses, group homes, probation, parole, intensive supervision, electric monitoring, restitution programs, victim-offender mediation, and even the death penalty. Corrections can be defined as all that society does to and with offendersRead MorePolice Officers And Officers Police And Corrections Officers1546 Words   |  7 Pages If My Mind Could Forget the Things My Eyes Have Seen Abuse by police officers and officers in penal institutions is a big subject in the media now. Turn to a news station and the chances of seeing at least on case are pretty high. The most unreported incidents, however, is actually assault on police officers and corrections officers. The media does not report these issues nearly as much as it tries to portray officer assault on criminals. Why is it that the media covers up the big issue ofRead MoreThe Issues Of The Criminal Justice System Essay1647 Words   |  7 PagesAbstract This research paper discusses the issues of people who suffer from mental illness being placed in jails instead of receiving the necessary treatment they need. The number of inmates serving time in jail or prison who suffer from mental illness continues to rise. In 2015 the Bureau of Justice reported that sixty five percent of state prisoners and fourth five percent of federal prisoners suffered from mental conditions such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Individuals who suffer from

Corporate Control Essay Example For Students

Corporate Control Essay Corporate ControlIt seems that there is an ever-increasing trend in our society. Big corporations are becoming more and more influential in our lives. As they gain more and more muscle in our government they also invade our schools and many other facets of our lives. Perhaps the most disturbing area of potential influence, however, is corporate control of the media. Can the American media uphold its values of free press under pressure from big corporations? Can they continue to present the absolute truth? The simple answer, especially in my opinion, is no. The movie The Insider provides us with an excellent case to back that point of view. Perhaps one of the biggest stories of this decade has been the tobacco industry. We saw them stand before Congress and tell the world that cigarettes were not addictive. The industry was able to lawyer its way out of trouble time and time again. They essentially used legal maneuvers, and certainly money, to keep the truth from the American people. Finally, we saw all that come to an end. We will write a custom essay on Corporate Control specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now When Jeff Wigand decided it was time to tell the truth, he put everything he valued at risk. He stood to loose his family, any chance at a job, and quite possibly his life. He knew all these things and still he went on, because he thought he could make a difference. He knew that his testimony would never be heard in a court of law, so where could he turn. The answer: the fourth and fifth estates, or the press and television. Every night millions of Americans sit down and watch the nightly news or read the paper. We know that we will be told all the days news, that we will be educated about what is happening in the world around us. We also know that we will be updated on issues that we care about as individuals and a society. Another delivery mechanism for information is television magazine shows like 60 Minutes. People know that when Mike Wallace talks to them, they should listen. They can also look at his reputation and know that he is telling the truth. Wigand put faith in that fact. Wigand agreed to do an interview with 60 Minutes because he knew that people would listen. He knew that the absolute truth would finally be out in the open, and that it would come from a source that people would believe. He risked everything because he had faith in the media and journalists. What happened next is, quite frankly, disgraceful. When the tobacco industry, specifically the company BW learned that CBS intended to air the interview, they began to lean on the CBS corporate office. They threatened lawsuits that could quite possibly mean that BW would end up owning CBS. There were other factors as well. Westinghouse was about to purchase CBS. That meant that corporate managers stood to make lots of money. A lawsuit with BW could have easily made Westinghouse pull out of the deal, and people would loose money. Essentially the whole situation came down to an issue of money. CBS News decided not to air the story. It is quite obvious that they did not make that decision based upon any journalistic issues. They were being leaned on by the corporate office, which was looking at dollar signs. CBS News was setting aside the truth for money, something it never should have even considered doing. Than goodness that Lowell Bergman was there to stop the lunacy. He correctly pointed out that the CBS corporate office had no right to tell CBS News what stories it could and could not air. The truth is the truth, no matter who it damages. Bergman embarked on a crusade to see that the whole story was aired. .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 , .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .postImageUrl , .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 , .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91:hover , .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91:visited , .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91:active { border:0!important; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91:active , .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91 .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u695868bd1b26118d32d015cc2deb4b91:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Breast Cancer EssayEventually CBS did air the entire interview. The only did so after receiving sharp criticism in The New York Times. The Washington Post, also showed that the smear campaign that CBS was using as justification for not airing the story, was nothing more than trumped up charges. CBS was left looking quite nasty, and decided to show the interview. The whole point is that business has no right to decide what is news. They have no right to come and stop a story from airing because it might hurt their profit margin. Obviously large news organizations need to have a corporate division to handle business affairs, but business should not be allowed to effect good journalism. At one point in the film, Bergman makes a comment about the press only being free to someone who can afford it. That is a powerful comment. The whole reason that the First Amendment exists is to ensure that the government cannot interfere with what we see and hear. The sad thing is, we are allowing business to do it instead. In our fine democratic tradition, we have never allowed to control what the press prints or broadcasts. We realize that education about issues is the best insurance that we have that our political system will survive. We cling to our belief in free speech and free press as one of our greatest accomplishments. Big corporations cannot be allowed to control what we see and here. If we did, all our news would be is a series of infomercials. We would never know the truth about what was happening within those companies. If they did something wrong, they could simply not publish it. Our faith in the news would be a sham. As we look at the news, we see the war against big business being waged. In Seattle, protestors are declaring war on the World Trade Organization. Our courts have decided that Microsoft is a monopoly, and they are siding against big business one class-action suite after another. Imagine what would happen if the big corporations had kept all that out of the news, if no one knew what was happening. What a crazy world we would be living in. Social Issues